Without exception these and the countless others include all the much loved stories about Prince Siddhattha’s confinement in a beautiful palace, his marriage to Yasodhara, saving a swan from his jealous cousin Devadatta, his encounter with an old man, a sick man, a corpse being taken for cremation and a wandering monk, and so on. And so they should, for such stories illustrate in a colourful and ingenious manner some of the central teachings of the Buddha.
But as a new book tells us, most of these stories cannot be found in the Pali Tripitaka, the oldest record we have of the Buddha’s life. A new biography of the Buddha, entitled "Footprints in the Dust; the Life of the Buddha from the most Ancient Sources" reveals to us these and many other little-known facts about the Buddha.
For example, the name Siddhattha is not to be found in the Tripitaka, nor is the name Yasodhara, indeed there is no mention at all about the Buddha’s marriage. We learn that Kapilavastu was not a great city – it hardly qualified to be a large town, a fact confirmed by archaeology. Everyone knows that King Bimbisara was a disciple of the Buddha, but strangely, of the several thousand dialogues of the Buddha in the Tripitaka there is not one between him and Bimbisara.
For me, these and other ‘facts’ were a bit disconcerting. But having read several other books by the author, Venerable Shravasti Dhammika Thera, I had at least some confidence that he knew what he was talking about. One of his earlier books, Nature and the Environment in Early Buddhism, published by Kandy’s prestigious Buddhist Publication Society specializing in works on Theravada Buddhism, is a meticulously referenced account of everything the Tripitaka says about plants, animals and the natural world and is a fascinating read.
Likewise, Ven. Dhammika’s Footprints is carefully researched and fully referenced. If I understand him correctly, Ven. Dhammika thinks that if all the iconic stories about the Buddha are not in the Tripitaka, then either they are legendary and date from centuries after the Buddha, or if true, then the arahats at the First Council did not consider them important enough to include in the Tripitaka. Ven. Dhammika’s approach is to assemble all the information about the Buddha found in the Tripitaka and present it to the reader. And the result is quite startling. It paints a picture of a person who was in some sense quite ordinary. He would wash his own feet before entering a building, he might sneeze while giving a sermon, he would not put so much food in his mouth that his cheeks bulged, he would only sleep for a few hours during the night, etc (all references given).
Personally, I found Chapters 7 and 8 the most illuminating and absorbing. In the first, the author gives a detailed account of what the Buddha might do in any one day – go for pindapata in the morning, do his ablutions, sit in meditation for a while, visit patients in the hospital, give a talk, take an afternoon nap, etc.
Chapter 8 is a detailed account of how the Buddha travelled in his effort to spread his Dhamma as far and as wide as possible. We learn how many yojanas (i.e. kilometres) the Buddha would travel during one of his Dhamma tours, what hardships he had to put up with, how rivers were crossed in a land where bridges were rare, etc.
In Chapters 6 and 9, Ven. Dhammika gives a full account of the Buddha’s personality and the overwhelming impression is of a person deeply concerned with human suffering who is moved by compassion to help them untangle themselves from the problems they cause for themselves and he did this with patience and persuasion, humour and honesty, with sound arguments and memorable similes. So Footprints gives us a portrait of the Buddha quite different from what we have known before; a much more human, approachable and warm one; and derived completely from the Tripitaka. Anyone interested in Buddhism will find this book a fascinating read.