To add to the police's woes, the autopsy report remains vague on the cause of death and as such the investigators now look to the viscera report for making some headway in the investigation.
When asked about the contents of the autopsy report, the Gaya SP Amit Jain said that though he has yet not personally gone through the report, he has come to know that the autopsy report is vague on the cause of death issue. "The nun's viscera have been preserved," said the SP.
The absence of any agents of fire like a match box, inflammable items, suicide note etc from the place of occurrence and the unbelievably calm death (a rarity bordering impossibility in the case of burns) have put spoke in the suicide theory, thereby compelling the police to look beyond the easy option of passing it out as suicide.
Some medical experts do not rule out the possibility of the nun having been heavily drugged before being torched to death by some miscreants. But the question remains as to who would torch an innocent nun, who has no known enmity with anybody. The skeptics are inclined to believe that if the nun did not commit suicide/immolation, then she might have been first drugged and then torched to deflect attention from major local issues like encroachments and holy tree branch cutting etc.
But this theory, like the suicide theory is not free from shortcomings, thereby reducing its credibility.
Interestingly, the incident is being differently interpreted by some devotees who see it as the attainment of salvation by the nun through internal combustion engineered by deep and relentless meditation. The subscribers of this view include the monk Arup Brahmachari.
The incident has also brought into light the declining level of sensitivity. Though nobody saw the fire being ignited, a crowd gathered soon after the flames were noticed by the nearby vendors and others.
